Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Foreclosures and the Displaced Family: Where Are they Going?

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

by Mark Salling, Ph.D., 1/19/10

The City of Cleveland and Cuyahoga County have seen a significant rise
in foreclosures. Clearly, families are losing their homes at a rapid
rate.

So where are families going when they have to leave the houses they
were trying to buy? Speculation includes: (1) they are moving away from
the county, region, or state; (2) they are moving in with relatives or
friends; and (3) they are moving into rental units.

A brief analysis by Community Solutions provides some data that
suggest that many displaced families have turned to the rental market.
That analysis uses data from the 2000 Census and the American Community
Survey (ACS) for years 2005 through 2008 to show vacancy rates in the
rental and owner unit markets in the county and city. (Find the report
HERE.

For both the county and city “for sale” rates rose precipitously
from 2000 to 2006, and leveled-off or increased slightly through 2008.
Meanwhile, though estimated “for rent” rates rose significantly from
2000 to 2005, they apparently declined from 2005 through 2008.

These findings suggest a series of other, related questions: What is
happening to rents in the city and suburbs? How is this displacement
affecting school enrollments? How many single family homes are being
rented rather than sold in order to wait-out the depressed housing
market? What neighborhoods are being affected most by these changes in
housing?

The 2010 Census and the continuing ACS will provide data that should
help us understand the consequences of current and future economic
trends.

ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT KEEPING ROUGHLY 200,000 OHIOANS OUT OF POVERTY IN RECESSION: ARRA Has Boosted Economy, Saved and Created Jobs

Monday, December 21st, 2009

By Emily Campbell

Along with boosting the economy and saving and creating jobs, seven
provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)
passed in February are also keeping about 204,000 Ohioans from falling
into poverty this year according to a new study from the Washington,
DC,-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

The Recovery Act as a whole is likely keeping many more Ohioans out of
poverty, since these seven provisions account for only about one-fourth
of the act’s total funding.

Not only has the Recovery Act saved and created jobs and prevented the
recession from being even more severe, but it has also provided real
help to struggling families.

The report is available at
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3035.

Breast Cancer Prevention

Monday, December 21st, 2009

by Wendy Feinn, 11/19/09

We heard this week about changes in recommendations for breast cancer
screenings. This caused a lot of debate weighing the benefits of early
detection versus unnecessary treatment, expense, and anxiety. If some
say that avoiding over-treatment is worth a slightly elevated risk, then
the greater success must be preventing the disease from occurring in the
first place.

Prevention is more than early detection and treatment – it’s helping
people avoid the entire experience. There are daily habits and
environmental factors that have been linked to risk of breast cancer,
like obesity, diets high in fat, heavy alcohol use, and exposure to
chemicals in the environment. These are areas where prevention can
occur.

It’s easy to celebrate the success of early intervention because we
know who survived because of it. It’s harder to celebrate prevention
because there’s no event to call attention to it, but that’s the
greatest achievement.

New report assesses community need

Monday, December 21st, 2009

by Terry Lenahan, 11/18/09

The 2009 Northeast Ohio Family Health Program Needs Assessment, a
report on health and socioeconomic trends in the region, is now
available at www.CommunitySolutions.com. As a Title X grantee, Community
Solutions provides demographic, reproductive health, education, and
economic trends for the five-county service area (Cuyahoga, Ashtabula,
Geauga, Lake, and Lorain counties) as part of its family planning needs
assessment plan.

The plan is used by Community Solutions and the delegate agencies of
the Northeast Ohio Family Health Program to achieve a better
understanding of current social and public health challenges in
providing family planning services. This plan was updated using the
latest data on the estimated need for family planning services.

The plan includes sections on demographics, education, economics,
maternal and child health, reproductive and sexual health, and women’s
health. Maps and data tables, with city, county, state, and national
data, are included in the appendices.

An example of available data in this plan is premature births (less
than 37 weeks gestation), the leading cause of newborn death and a major
cause of lifelong disability. A recent Plain Dealer article stated
Ohio’s premature birth rate of 13.2 percent earned an F in the
March of Dimes’ Premature Birth Report Card. But the state average
masks a worse problem in Northeast Ohio cities: Cleveland’s rate was
18.3 percent and Lorain’s rate was 13.9 percent.

Here is a link for the report:
http://www.communitysolutions.com/pr…esource_id=139
The 2009 Northeast Ohio Family Health Program Needs Assessment was
co-authored by Terry Lenahan, Research, and Melissa Federman, Family
Planning.

Green Jobs in Ohio

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

by John Habat, J.D.

There is a lot of anticipation and speculation about emerging green
industries and the economic activity it will generate. Unquestionably
the movement to green industries – renewable energy, energy efficiency
and so forth – is catching wind and will result in significant new
business and employment opportunities. What is not as certain, however,
is the type of jobs and skills that will be needed.

Based upon a survey of green businesses conducted by Community
Solutions, we found that green business activity and employment are
growing significantly, the skills and capabilities of existing workers
are readily adaptable to green jobs, and that for the most part, any
specialized skills needed are already present the workforce. While the
skills are present, the quantity of workers ready for training in those
skills is a concern. Once again, we return to critical need to prepare
Ohio’s youth with a basic and legitimate high school education.
Ohio’s ability to fully participate in new green opportunities
depends upon it.

You can read the full report, “Ohio’s Green Jobs” here:
http://tinyurl.com/yhnzqkj

Ohio Taxes Hit Poor and Middle Class Far Harder than the Wealthy

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

by Jon Honeck, Ph.D.

Low- and middle-income Ohioans pay a much greater share of their income
in state and local taxes than the state’s most affluent do, according
to a study released today by the Institute on Taxation and Economic
Policy (ITEP).

The study’s key finding is that nearly every state and local tax
system takes a much greater share of income from middle- and low-income
families than from the wealthy. Only two states require their best-off
citizens to pay as much of their incomes in taxes as their poorest
families must pay, and only one – California – taxes its wealthiest
individuals at a rate higher than middle-income families have to pay.

The top 1 percent of non-elderly Ohio families by income, who earned at
least $352,000 in 2007, on average pay 7.8 percent of their income in
state and local taxes. By contrast, the lowest fifth, who make less than
$17,000, on average pay 12.0 percent. Families in the middle fifth of
the income spectrum, who make between $32,000 and $50,000, on average
pay 11.0 percent.

Recent changes in Ohio’s state and local tax system have increased
the disparity. The report found that Ohio ranks 28th among states in the
fairness of its tax system, based on the share of their income affluent
Ohioans are paying in state and local taxes compared to that of lower-
and middle-income Ohioans. Last time the study was done, which covered
the law as of 2002, Ohio ranked 14th by this measure.

Read the report, Who Pays? A Distributional Analysis of the Tax Systems
in All 50 States, here: http://www.itepnet.org/whopays.htm

Last Week in Washington

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

by Emily Campbell

Congress was in the eye of the legislative hurricane last week, after
the House’s close vote on health reform over the weekend and before
the Senate package emerges. Meanwhile, the talk this week was all about
jobs. Not much to report on the estate tax and debt limit extensions; we
don’t expect action on either until December.

HEALTH REFORM

Last Saturday evening the House passed its historic health
reform bill, the Affordable Health Care for America Act. The margin was
slim, but the victory is enormous – it’s a big step in the right
direction for significantly increasing the number of people with health
insurance and starting the difficult process of curbing cost growth in
the healthcare sector.

Thanks in large part to the last-minute outreach from advocates back
home, several Members who were on the fence voted for the legislation
including Kaptur, Space, and Wilson. Representatives Boccieri and
Kucinich joined Ohio’s Republican Members in voting “no” on the
bill. Kucinich cited the weakness of the Public Plan Option as the
reason for his decision, while in a statement posted on his website,
Boccieri stated that the bill does not do enough to reduce costs over
time. Boccieri has not ruled out voting for the final bill that emerges
from Conference Committee so advocacy in the coming weeks will be
critical.

Action Steps

If you reached out, please be sure to thank your
Representatives who voted in favor of the health reform bill if you
haven’t done so already.

Senate
Majority Leader Reid would like to start floor debate on a
merged Senate bill next week, before the Thanksgiving break but that is
looking less likely since CBO has not completed scoring the provisions
to be included in the package.

The push to move is a response to requests from Republican senators to
debate the bill for at least four weeks. So expect long days as well as
weekend sessions once the Senate takes up a bill.

The Democratic leaders’ goal is to complete floor action on a health
care bill by Christmas. We expect the merged bill to cost less than the
President’s $900b limit, and to include changes in the subsidy
structure and the employer mandate.

According to media reports, an increase in the Medicare payroll tax on
high-wage earners is being considered in the Senate as a source of
funding for health reform. We think it should be considered on top of
the excise tax although we understand some of this would replace a small
part of the excise tax.

STATE FISCAL RELIEF

Now that they have voted on a health reform measure, the House has
turned its attention to jobs-creation and wants to take up some kind of
jobs legislation before the end of the year. The extended unemployment
benefit program and the COBRA provision adopted in ARRA both expire in
December, providing a vehicle for further legislation. It appears that
House leaders do not want to put together another massive package like
ARRA. Instead, this package (often described as a “jobs bill”) is
expected to be smaller and more narrowly focused on mechanisms to spur
job growth. This package is the most likely vehicle for extending fiscal
relief to the states, though we are going to have to work hard to make
that happen.

APPROPRIATIONS

The President has signed five of the twelve appropriations bills,
including the Interior conference report which contained a continuing
resolution to extend funding for programs without an approved
appropriations bill through December 18.

CONGRESSIONAL SCHEDULE

The House and Senate will both be out of session during the week of
Thanksgiving. House Majority Leader Hoyer has now indicated the House is
likely to be in session until December 22nd and could come back into
session after New Year’s weekend if needed. The Senate is likely to be
most of December as well.

Three Large Ohio Cities among Nation’s Poorest

Monday, October 19th, 2009

By Emily Campbell

In Ohio’s cities, the ranks of those living in poverty are growing,
according to Census Bureau data released this week. Nearly one-third of
Cleveland residents eke out an existence below the poverty line, making
it the second poorest city in America. The poverty threshold for a
family of four is $22,050.

Ohio has the dubious distinction of being the only state with more than
one large city among the 10 poorest in America. Cincinnati ranked
seventh with 25.1 percent in poverty, and Toledo ranted eighth with a
poverty rate of 24.7 percent.

A total of 75 American cities have populations greater than 250,000
residents. Columbus rounds out Ohio’s large cities with a poverty
rate of 20.1 percent, ranking 22nd overall.

In short, these numbers are a reminder that poverty affected a
substantial share of Ohio’s individuals, families, and children, even
before the worst part of the recession hit. Ohio’s policymakers will
continue to face tough decisions about how to balance the state’s
budget as mid-year gaps emerge and federal recovery dollars run out.
They should avoid making cuts to programs that are critical to the
well-being of struggling families and should look to additional
revenue-generating measures to help fill shortfalls.

For more:
http://www.communitysolutions.com/images/upload/resources/LargeCitiesPoor_ACSCensusData092909.pdf

Do we need health reform? New data doesn’t lie

Sunday, September 20th, 2009

By Emily Campbell

President Obama made his case for health care reform last night, and new Census figures out today underscore the importance of enacting health reform legislation this year.

Our current health care system creates the worst of both worlds: higher costs and rising numbers of uninsured families. Current trends are unsustainable. If we do nothing, health care costs will consume 95% of the growth in our economy by 2050.

Data released Sept. 10, from the Census Bureau show that half a million fewer Ohioans have employer sponsored health coverage in 2007-2008 than at the beginning of the decade. If they all wanted to watch the Buckeyes, they would fill Ohio Stadium almost five times over.

Many of those people are turning to government coverage programs. Not at all surprising is the fact that Ohioans in public health coverage in programs including Medicaid and Medicare increased to 17.6% in 2007-2008 from 12.5% in 2000-2001. This increase is straining government budgets, especially at the state level where health programs make up more than one-quarter of all spending.

Because the new data only goes through the end of 2008, next year’s figures will undoubtedly be worse. During 2009 the recession has deepened in Ohio and across the country. Just look at unemployment, which grew 1.7% in 2008. Already Ohio’s unemployment has risen 3.8% during 2009 to 11.4%. If a person doesn’t have a job, they obviously won’t have employer sponsored health coverage.

Congress is back in session this week and must get back to work to craft a bill that provides quality, affordable health coverage for all Americans. Hundreds of thousands in Ohio simply can’t wait.

Teen Dating Violence: A Closer Look

Monday, September 14th, 2009

By Denise Walsh

Teen dating violence (TDV) has emerged as a significant social and public health problem. Adolescents ages 16-24 experience the highest per capita rate of intimate partner violence of any age group-rates nearly triple the national average. Younger adolescents are also at risk: a recent study found significant levels of abusive behavior in “tween” (ages 11 to 14) dating relationships, and teens report that abusive behavior increases dramatically in the later teen years.

Dating violence among young adolescents is all too commonplace. It results from social attitudes and practices that normalize unhealthy behaviors in interpersonal relationships. Adolescents are often pressured to conform to masculine or feminine gender roles that reinforce unequal power and control between dating partners. Teen victims may be especially vulnerable due to their inexperience in dating relationships, their susceptibility to peer pressure, and their reluctance to tell an adult about the abuse. Many teen dating behaviors, such as extreme jealousy or possessiveness, are considered normal and may be perceived as signs of love.

Adolescence is a critical time in developing lifelong behaviors, attitudes, and expectations about intimate relationships. Teens in abusive relationships have a higher likelihood of being in abusive relationships as adults. Research indicates that TDV experiences are associated with multiple health risk behaviors, including alcohol use and binge drinking; marijuana and other substance use; unhealthy weight control behaviors; sexual risk behaviors and pregnancy. Victims of TDV have also reported elevated rates of poorer self-esteem, as well as antisocial behavior, depression, extreme sadness, and suicide. Without adequate information and support, teens are likely to continue the cycle of violence into their adult lives. By preventing and intervening in abusive relationships in adolescence, we can help ensure a healthier future for our youth and reinforce attitudes about equality and respect in relationships.

As loving and caring adults, we have the responsibility of guiding our young and helping them develop healthy attitudes and behaviors. We must promote social norms that support healthy relationships free from violence, giving teens the tools to identify unhealthy relationships and to support their peers who are involved in abusive relationships. We are the key to keeping our children safe.

(For more information on this subject, see the August issue of Planning & Action, page 6.)